CHOICE

connect

A publication of the Association of College and Research Libraries
A division of the American Library Association
Editorial Offices: 575 Main Street, Suite 300, Middletown, CT 06457-3445
Phone: (860) 347-6933
Fax: (860) 704-0465

FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY

Please do not link to this page.

October 2021 Vol. 59 No. 2


Cornell University Press


The following review appeared in the October 2021 issue of CHOICE. The review is for your internal use only. Please review our Permission and Reprints Guidelines or email permissions@ala-choice.org.

Humanities
Language & Literature

59-0343
PN51
CIP
Trask, Michael. Ideal minds: raising consciousness in the antisocial seventies. Cornell, 2020. 258p bibl index ISBN 9781501752438, $39.99; ISBN 9781501752445 ebook, $19.99.

Trask (Univ. of Kentucky) engages an eclectic range of texts—philosophical, legal, sociological, economic, and literary discourses of the 1970s—to look at the cultural underpinnings of antiutilitarianism, the rejection of people en masse, and the revival of a subjectivity he describes as neo-idealism—evident in a preoccupation with the development and monetizing of higher consciousness, which helped initiate the economics of neo-liberalism in the following decades. Much of what he deals with comes from the period’s "fringe" (his term) discourses, so Philip K. Dick, Charles Reich, Alvin Toffler, and Hal Lindsey share company with Don DeLillo, John Irving, James Merrill, and John Rawls (to mention just some of the thinkers discussed). The array of references and quotations is dizzying, and taken together they create a convincing portrait of the zeitgeist. Not strictly moral philosophy, history, or literary criticism, Trask’s book occasionally bows under the weight of its learning and his argument gets lost. But his reevaluation of the period’s intellectual and cultural currents is remarkable: as he writes in the introduction, “The decade’s centrifuge was consciousness itself.” Consequently, New Age seekers and Christian fundamentalists, to identify one curious pairing, shared common ground in the 1970s as they do in this demanding book.

--B. Diemert, Brescia University College

Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.